Editorial Standards
99 Purity Peptides'
Corrections Policy
Effective Date: September 2026
Our research guides reference clinical trial data, dosing figures, and compound characteristics drawn from published literature. When we get a figure or a claim wrong, we correct it in place, note when the correction was made, and explain what changed. This page describes that process.
01. Our Commitment to Accuracy
Every research guide we publish is written and reviewed against primary sources — peer-reviewed studies, clinical trial publications, and manufacturer certificates of analysis — rather than secondary summaries. When a figure cannot be traced back to a primary source, we say so on the page instead of presenting it as settled.
02. How We Identify and Verify Corrections
Corrections are triggered by internal review, reader reports, or discrepancies found while researching related content. Before any figure or claim is changed, we re-check it against the original publication (not a secondhand citation of it) and confirm the correction is itself accurate before publishing it.
03. How We Publish Corrections
Confirmed corrections are made directly on the affected page, and the page's visible "last updated" date is refreshed to reflect the change. We do not silently edit a claim that readers may have cited or relied on — the correction replaces the error in place rather than being appended as a footnote, so the page always reflects our current understanding.
04. How to Report a Possible Error
If you believe something we've published is inaccurate, email us with:
- The URL of the page in question.
- The specific claim or figure you believe is incorrect.
- A link or citation to the source you're basing that on, if you have one.
- Your contact information, in case we need to follow up.
Report an Error
Send corrections or questions about published content to:
We'd rather be told we're wrong and fix it than leave an error live. Thank you for helping us keep this content accurate.